Long before Florida became a state in 1845, Florida’s territorial government sought to protect Floridians. As early as 1828, Florida enacted a requirement that non-residents file a ‘bond with approved security in the sum of one hundred dollars, conditioned for the payment of all Cost and charges which may be adjudged against him in said suit. (“Cost Bond”). Florida’s Cost Bond requirement remains basically the same as the original 1828 version with only one major change and several minor revisions primarily related to section numbering.
Cost Bond legislation is not unique to Florida. More than half of the United States has similar legislation. Some states make the Cost Bond an affirmative duty of the non-resident plaintiff while other states require that a defendant demand that the plaintiff file a non resident cost bond and/or file a motion to compel a nonresident plaintiff to file a Cost Bond.
The reasons for enacting the Cost Bond statute are seemingly lost to history. However, it is easy to conclude that the reasons include Florida’s concern that its residents may be harmed if costs assessed against a non-resident plaintiff remain unpaid and the non-resident plaintiff avoids Florida courts’ jurisdiction; this is supported by case law. Another reason that the statute may have been adopted was to help limit frivolous suits by non-resident plaintiffs against Florida residents. Limiting frivolous lawsuits may well have been a significant reason because, particularly in the early years of the statute, $100 was a large sum of money and thus the Cost Bond was a high threshold for non-resident plaintiffs to gain access to Florida courts.